Home
Nearly two a long time before this, in 1808, Supreme Court Advocate on returning to Chandigarh right after visiting his estates experienced involuntarily located himself in a major place amid the Chandigarh Supreme Court Advocates .

Seasoned Law Firms in Supreme Court of India - Simranjeet Law Associates 815, Sec 16D, Chandigarh .

VSAT services were liberalized for providing data services to closed user groups. We therefore hold that the appellants were entitled to have full benefit and advantage of Clause 10 of the Scheme and the curtailment of the period and opportunity available under said Clause 10 of the Scheme by subsequent G. This question, in our opinion, is settled by the decisions of this Court. It draws a distinction between 'workmen' as such and the managerial or supervisory staff, and confers benefit on the former only.

The Act is primarily meant for regulating the relations of employers and workmen-past, present and future. " Provided further that the competent Appellate Authority shall have the power to admit the appeal after the prescribed period of limitation when the appellant satisfies the Appellate Authority that he had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal 1257 within such period. The five broad Content Regulations contained in the draft guidelines framed by the Committee are similar to the provisions found in the Australian guidelines.

These are words of very great amplitude. In other words, those are errors which a court sitting as a court of appeal only, could have examined and, if necessary, corrected. However, under each broad head specific regulatory parameters have been indicated which seem to embody what would be good practices in the Indian context. The Union of India (1), and the first principle is whether the legislature would have enacted the valid part if it had known that the rest of the statute was invalid.

Only the manner of the exercise of its appellate jurisdiction was in controversy, It has not been shown that in exercising its powers, the Appellate Authority disregarded any mandatory provisions of the law. Issue of licenses to other prospective GMPCS operators is under consideration. In the judgments and orders impugned in these appeals, the High Court has exercised its supervisory jurisdic note in respect of errors which cannot be said to be errors of law apparent on the face of the record.

Dhume, that " the payment of the service fee for the services of this nature is quite a common feature in India ". The 1st Appellant, Chintamanrao, is the Managing-Partner of the firm while the 2nd appellant, Kantilal, is its active Manager. We need not multiply authorities, because every book on toxicology begins with a statement of such a fact. The process of manufacture, so far as is relevant to the question raised, is carried out in two stages. After a competitive bidding process, licenses were awarded to a CMTS operators in the four metros, 14 CMTS operators in 18 state circles, 6 BTS operators in 6 state circles and to paging operators in 27 cities and 18 state circles.

The Government has recently announced the policy for Internet Service Provision (ISP) by private operators and has commenced licensing of the same. Section 9(3) of the Act, gives it the power to pass such orders as it thought fit. Of course, there is a chemical test for almost every poison, but it is impossible to expect a search for every poison. Union of India [(1985) 3 SCC 314: 1985 SCC (Tax) 416] .

2000 was bad and ineffective. Brijlal Manilal and Company is a bidi factory situated in Sagar. Licences were issued to 14 operators in the private sector out of which only nine licencees are operational. The Company manufactures bidis. The principle underlying the jurisdiction to issue a writ or order of certiorari, is no more in doubt, but the real difficulty arises, as it often does, in applying the principle to the particular facts of a given case.

The last reason adopted by the Tribunal clearly overlooks the fact that shortly after the execution of the agreement about 26% of shares in the company were acquired by an Indian company and year after year ever since then these independent shareholders of the Indian company had willingly accepted the service agreement. The Government has also announced opening up of Global Mobile Personal Communications by Satellite (GMPCS) and has issued one provisional license.

The reasonableness and legality of the payment of such fee is also supported by the fact that the income-tax authorities and the Reserve Bank of India have not taken any exception to such payment. The jurisdiction of the Appellate Authority, to entertain the appeals, has never been in doubt or dispute. The Government invited private sector participation in a phased manner from the early nineties, initially for value added services such as Paging Services and Cellular Mobile Telephone Services (CMTS) and thereafter for Fixed Telephone Services (FTS).

Reference may be made to the decision of this Court in Empire Industries Ltd. This principle relating to statutes was extended by this Court to orders in Shewpujanrai Indrasanrai Ltd. If at all they are errors, they are errors in appreciation of documentary evidence or affidavits, errors in drawing -inferences or omission to draw inferences. Lamination, indisputably by the well settled principles of excise law, amounts to ˜manufacture. As already indicated, the Appellate Authority had unlimited jurisdiction to examine and appreciate the evidence in the exercise of its appellate or revisional jurisdiction.
Back to posts
This post has no comments - be the first one!

UNDER MAINTENANCE

XtGem Forum catalog