The first point need not be considered as I am clearly of the view that no " reasonable opportunity " within the meaning of cl. -This petition under Art. 2(b) of the Act in so far as it permits an area which was a disturbed area in the past to be declared a disturbed area for the purposes of the Act, offends art. He further stated that at 10:30 A. The failure to observe the provisions of the section did not render the compromise decrees in this case a nullity.

(b) was a particular deeming Provision with regard to the taluqdar and his cadet and (3)that whatever might have been the position of a " Lal- liti " holder earlier, on the abolition of the Taluqdari tenure by the Bombay Taluqdari Abolition Act, he became a holder in actual possession of land in respect of which the Government had not transferred its rights to the payment of revenue, wholly or partially,to the ownership of any person. Section 4(1) authorised the Provincial Government to allot cases for trial to a special judge by notification as well as transfer cases from one special judge to another or to withdraw any case from the jurisdiction of the special judge or make such modifications in the description of a case as may be considered necessary.

[1969] INSC 101; (1969) 2 SCC 43, wherein the question was whether the expression business of the society appearing in Section 61 of the Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 covered a dispute in respect of alteration of the conditions of service of an employee of the society. 131 of 1957 before us. The main judgment has, however, been delivered by the said Authority in the application filed by Mr. The material parts of cls. 4) is the neighbour of the accused Saurabh in the commercial premises.

1996 at about 10:30 A. Radhakisan Khushaldas (2 ), and Bristol And Exeter Railway v. That portion of the Act and the Notification of September 12, 1952, must therefore be held to be void. The Madras Railway Company (1), G. Pradhan (hereafter called the respondent) which gives rise to Civil Appeal No. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SUBBA RAO J. The declaration advocates in Supreme Court the present case was made under that portion of s. The Additional Industrial Tribunal, Andhra Pradesh and Ors.

Collins (3); (iv) the Receiving Railway, which is the bailee of the goods, is authorized by the consignor to appoint the Forwarding Railway as a sub-bailee, and, after such appointment, direct relationship of bailment is constituted between the consignor and the sub-bailee; and (v) in the case of through booked traffic the consignor of the goods is given an option under's. Reference may also be made to the decision of this Court in The Co- operative Central Bank Ltd.

The tribunal and the High Court had in that case taken the view that such a dispute fell outside the purview of Section 61 of the Act. (ii) both the Railways constitute a partnership and each acts as the agent of the other; (iii) the Receiving Railway is the agent of the consignor in entrusting the goods to the Forwarding Railway: an instructive and exhaustive discussion on the said three principles in their application to varying situations is found in Kulu Ram Maigraj v.

9 and 10 of the Order read:- clause 9. The Central Government or any other Officer authorised in this behalf may cancel any licence granted under this Order or otherwise render it ineffective (a) if the licence has been granted through inadvertence or mistake or has been obtained by fraud or misrepresentation;". 2(b) and it cannot be sustained. 14 of the Constitution and is therefore unconstitutional and void. 32 of the Constitution is filed by the Mineral Development Limited against the State of Bihar and another for the issue of a writ of certiorari to quash the order of the Government of Bihar dated September 7, 1955, cancelling the petitioner's licence and for the issue of a writ of mandamus directing them to forbear from giving effect to the said order of cancellation.

The appointment of representatives could not hence have been intended to be obligatory. when he was having a conversation with the father of the accused Saurabh, Saurabh told his father that some incident had occurred in the College and he was going to the hospital. 10 of the Order was given to the 424 petitioners by the Chief Controller. "Cancellation of Licences. 445 Clearly, the Court of Wards could itself settle a litigation in which two of its wards were involved even where representatives had been appointed under s.

We would, therefore, deal with this appeal in particular and our decision in this appeal will govern the rest of the appeals in this group. , he saw accused Saurabh with his father going to their shop. 5(1) of the Bombay Taluqdari Abolition Act was a general provision and applied the Bombay Land Revenue Code to all taluqdari lands, while cl. Hira, Works Manager, Central Railway Workshop and Factory, Parel, Bombay (hereafter called the appellant) by the employees at the said factory (hereafter called the respondents) under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (IV of 1936) claiming payment of overtime wages since 1948.

Furthermore, the PW-12 and PW-13 also confirmed that the body at the morgue was that of the deceased. therefore, the section is clearly directory. 80 of the Indian Railways. All these applications were heard by the Payment of Wages Authority, Bombay, as companion matters and they have been disposed of by a common judgment. Act to recover compensation either from the Railway Administration to which the goods are delivered or from the Railway Administration in whose jurisdiction the loss, injury.

The shop of this witness is situated just opposite to the shop of Saurabhs father. Consequently, the said PW-12 and PW-13 reached the Police Station and on the basis of a photograph of the body of the deceased and the clothes that were seized, they confirmed the identity of the deceased. Shri Pravesh Kumar Nagpal (D.