Home
Nearly two a long time before this, in 1808, Supreme Court Advocate on returning to Chandigarh right after visiting his estates experienced involuntarily located himself in a major place amid the Chandigarh Supreme Court Advocates .

Most Famous Law Firms in Supreme Court of India - Advocate Simranjeet Singh Sidhu House Number 815,.

In the circumstances, it must be held that it has not been established by the appellants that the Chief Minister made the speeches indicating his closed mind on the subject of nationalisation of bus transport in Krishna District. In view of such clear and categorical legal distinction, the State cannot be blamed for creating two electoral colleges and confining election rolls for the post of ex-officio secretary only to the members of the Bordeori families including females.

In our opinion, the measure of punishment in a given case must depend upon the atrocity of the crime; the conduct of the criminal and the defenceless and unprotected state of the victim. The contrary view is expressed by the Bombay High Court in the earlier case of Harakchand Makanji & Co. In view of discussions made earlier it is evident that the Bordeori families enjoy a distinct status and monopoly in matters connected with the religious as well as secular management of the temple of Sri Sri Maa Kamakhya and hence the claim of equality on behalf of Deoris associated with the Nanan Devalayas or even with Maa Kamakhya Temple does not have any merit.

to each of the remaining eight members of the crew. We are unable (and we say this with due respect) to accept the view adumbrated in the Calcutta cases. The alleged discrimination vis-à-vis Deoris has no foundation. Submissions were advanced but no pleading or proof was placed before us to show that lands of Nanan Devalayas have also been acquired. Justice demands that courts should impose punishment befitting the crime so that the courts reflect public abhorrence of the crime.

Hence the challenge to the impugned provisions in the Rules on ground of Article 14 fails. " It is, therefore, quite clear that the extra period is available only if a notice under sub-s. 34 has been issued within the time therein limited. The difference between coma due to disease and coma as the result of poisons is stated by him in the following words: Depressants, sedatives and hypnoties all cause death by coma (ibid.

That view was accepted by the Madras High Court in P. It was the custom of the owners when the gross earnings of the boat exceeded pound 100 for any one trip (each trip being usually of about a week's duration) to allow a sum of pound 2 by way of bonus, of which pound, I went to the captain and 2s. Commissioner of Income- tax (1) and lawyers in Supreme Cour of Indiat the judgment under appeal. Moreover, it is discretionary power under Section 25A under which the State may choose not to have any Managing Committee separately for the Nanan Devalayas.

If the gross earnings of the (1) [1910] 1 K. " Notwithstanding the fact that the Chief Minister did not accept the correctness of the statements attributed to him in the newspapers, no attempt was made by the appellants to file any affidavit in the High Advocate Supreme Court India sworn to by persons who had attended the meetings addressed by the Chief Minister and heard him making the said statements. The courts must not only keep in view the rights of the criminal but also the rights of the victim of crime and the society at large while considering imposition of appropriate punishment.

Imposition of appropriate punishment is the manner in which the courts respond to the societys cry for justice against the criminals. It has not been pleaded or proved that Sri Sri Maa Kamakhya temple and endowment is not so covered. According to him, the following reasons existed for holding that Laxmibai did not suffer from diabetic coma: Each of his reasons is supported by citations from numerous standard medical authorities on the subject, but it is unnecessary to cite them once again.

The plea that Rules must cover not only the temple and endowment of Sri Sri Maa Kamakhya Devalaya but the entire complex including Nanan Devalayas has no support or basis Lawyers in Supreme Court of India law. The symptoms, according to the author, are sleepiness, mental confusion, unsteadiness rapidly followed by coma with slow shallow respiration, flaccid muscles and absent deep reflexes. We, therefore, hold that the Chief Minister was not disqualified to hear the objections against the scheme of nationali- sation.

If these newspaper cuttings are excluded from evidence, the factual basis for the appellants' argument disappears. where a notice under sub-section (1) has been issued within the time therein limited, the assessment or reassessment to be made in pursuance of such 119 notice may be made before the expiry of one year from the date of the service of the notice even if such period exceeds the period of . The Company claimed to be entitled to deduct in computing its profits amounts representing at current prices, the liability to effect replacements as soon as the required equipment became obtainable.

Fair treatment to others interested in the temple is assured by permitting the ˜Devotees to elect as many as five members of the Managing Committee. 594 It is not possible nor desirable to treat paper cuttings of statements said to have been made on several occasions as legal evidence in a judicial enquiry. The Act permits the State to constitute a Managing Committee for each of the Institution covered by Section 25A of the Act.

In fact the lands acquired under the Act appear mainly of main temple of Sri Sri Maa Kamakhya. The former amounts were allowed as deductions, and the latter the Court of Appeal (reversing the decision (1) (1948) 30 T.
Back to posts
This post has no comments - be the first one!

UNDER MAINTENANCE

Ring ring